We are located in Haining City, Zhejiang Province, one of China's famous knitting industrial Bases.
Finishing treatments transform a fabric's tactile and performance properties without changing its base yarns. For lingerie — where next-to-skin comfort, appearance, fit and durability are critical — treatments such as brushing, calendaring and moisture-wicking finishes play a decisive role. This article explains the mechanisms of each finishing method, how they change hand-feel, drape and thermal behavior, and practical guidance for specifying, testing and combining finishes in intimate apparel.
Brushing: creating a softer, warmer hand
Brushing is a mechanical finish that raises and teases fiber ends from the fabric surface to produce a soft, fuzzy nap. In lingerie, brushing is used on certain cup linings, sleepwear, and soft briefs to enhance next-to-skin softness and perceived warmth. The depth and density of the nap depend on fiber type, stitch density and brush parameters; synthetic microfibers yield a very fine, suede-like hand while natural fibers (cotton, modal) produce a warmer, fluffier surface.
Key effects on fabric properties
Brushing increases surface volume and reduces perceived stiffness, improving plushness and insulation. However, it also increases surface friction and has a higher propensity for pilling and lint transfer. For stretch fabrics used in bras or shaping underwear, excessive brushing can reduce recovery if fiber ends are over-agitated.
Process variables and control
Control brushing intensity (roller speed, brush density, nip pressure) to balance softness with durability. Use lighter brushing for fine-gauge knits to avoid weakening loops. Post-brushing shearing or singeing can refine nap height and reduce loose fibers that cause pilling.

Calendaring: smoothing, sheen and controlled compactness
Calendaring passes the fabric through heated rollers under pressure to flatten surface irregularities, increase luster, and alter drape. For lingerie, calendaring is commonly applied to microfibers and satin-like knits to achieve a smooth, sensual hand and controlled opacity. The thermal and mechanical action can also slightly compact the structure, improving dimensional stability for molded cups and edge finishes.
Effects on aesthetics and performance
Calendaring enhances surface smoothness and reduces micro-surface friction, which improves slide against skin and under outer garments. It can also reduce surface hairiness and lower pilling risk. But high heat or too much pressure can reduce stretchability, change hand from soft to slightly firm, and in heat-sensitive fibers may cause gloss inconsistency or thermal damage.
Process recommendations
Choose roller temperature and speed according to fiber melting or glass transition temperatures. Use a nip pressure profile that achieves desired sheen without permanently restricting elasticity. For stretch lingerie, nip settings should allow elastic recovery tests post-calendaring.
Moisture-wicking finishes: improving comfort and microclimate
Moisture-wicking finishes modify surface energy or create capillary channels so liquid sweat moves from the skin-facing side to the outer surface, where it can spread and evaporate. In lingerie — particularly sports bras, active intimates and summer wear — these finishes reduce cling, speed dry time, and lower the microclimate temperature next to skin.
Mechanisms and chemistries
Wicking is achieved by low-surface-energy hydrophobic treatments combined with engineered yarn or knit structures, or by using hydrophilic finishes that attract moisture and transport it through the fabric. Common chemistries include silicone-based finishes that change wetting behavior, and polymeric hydrophilic finishes (polyethylene glycol derivatives, polyurethane dispersions) that create a thin water-attractive layer.
Trade-offs and durability
Hydrophilic finishes provide excellent moisture uptake but can feel cooler or slightly tacky when wet; hydrophobic channel-based approaches maintain a dry hand but rely on structural capillarity. Durability varies: some finishes remain effective after hundreds of washes (carefully selected polymeric systems), while simpler surface coatings may wash off or wear with abrasion. Always validate after laundering and wear simulations.
Other functional finishes and combined effects
Lingerie fabrics often require multiple finishes combined to meet comfort, hygiene and appearance targets. Examples include antimicrobial/odor-control treatments, silicone softeners, anti-pilling resins and flame-retardant finishes (where required by regulation). Each additional finish interacts with the others — for instance, heavy silicone softeners can reduce the effectiveness of moisture-wicking chemistries by increasing surface hydrophobicity.
Compatibility considerations
Establish a finishing sequence and compatibility matrix: clean/pre-treat, apply functional coatings (antimicrobial), then deposit softeners or calendaring. Perform small-batch trials to verify that tactile and performance goals survive post-processing and washing cycles.
Comparative effects table: brushing, calendaring and wicking
| Finish | Primary change | Hand-feel outcome | Durability concerns |
| Brushing | Raised nap, increased volume | Softer, warmer, plush | Pilling, lint, reduced abrasion life |
| Calendaring | Smooth, compact, sheen | Silky, smooth, slightly firmer | Reduced elasticity if over-processed |
| Moisture-wicking finish | Altered wetting and transport | Dry-to-touch, cooler during sweat | Wash-off/abrasion for some chemistries |
Testing and quality control for finished lingerie fabrics
Quantify finishing effects using objective tests: Kawabata or hand-value proxies for subjective hand; drape coefficient to measure fold behavior; moisture management tests (AATCC 195, vertical wicking tests) for wicking finishes; pilling tests (Martindale or Random Tumble); and repeated wash/abrasion cycles to assess durability. Include sensory panels for final wear-feel validation because instrument data alone may miss subjective comfort nuances.
Specification and selection checklist for designers and buyers
- Define target hand and thermal behavior: plush/warm vs smooth/cool.
- List required performance: wicking speed, drying time, pilling resistance, elasticity retention.
- Specify allowable optical changes: sheen, opacity and color shift after finishing.
- Require compatibility testing when combining finishes (softener + wicking + antimicrobial).
- Include wash and wear cycle validation: both domestic and accelerated laundering.
Practical tips to balance comfort, appearance and durability
Start with the base fabric: higher filament-count microfibers respond well to calendaring and give a luxurious sheen without heavy coatings. Use light brushing only where plushness is required and minimize nap height to reduce pilling. For active lingerie, prioritize engineered yarn structures plus durable hydrophilic finishes rather than heavy surface softeners. Always prototype with full garment construction (seams, elastic attachments, trims) because finishes can interact differently at bonded or stitched areas.
Conclusion: match finish to function and lifecycle
Finishing treatments are powerful levers to tune lingerie fabric performance. Brushing enhances softness and warmth but raises pilling risk; calendaring creates smoothness and sheen with careful control of elasticity; moisture-wicking finishes improve comfort in active or warm conditions but must be selected for wash durability. Specify finishes based on the garment's intended use and expected lifetime, validate with objective and sensory tests, and plan finishing sequences to avoid counterproductive interactions.
English
Español
عربى